<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Communicators Know Both the Pareto Rule and the Dilbert Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/</link>
	<description>Know More HR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Roche</title>
		<link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Roche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Hi Donald, yep, that&#039;s my approach too. I give advice, but when it comes down to it, we do what the client requests. And yes, I&#039;m happy to make changes when it stands between our work and getting paid for it.

I often tell young editors that they should not read a piece the first time with a red pen in their hand. That just begs &quot;editing.&quot; I say &quot;Read for meaning, first, then edit.&quot; I&#039;m a light editor as a result...maybe it&#039;s my age, maybe it&#039;s journalism training, but I like to write it down and get outta there. I&#039;ve almost never found that having &quot;extra time&quot; to edit makes a document much better. Usually that editing effort is dilutive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donald, yep, that&#8217;s my approach too. I give advice, but when it comes down to it, we do what the client requests. And yes, I&#8217;m happy to make changes when it stands between our work and getting paid for it.</p>
<p>I often tell young editors that they should not read a piece the first time with a red pen in their hand. That just begs &#8220;editing.&#8221; I say &#8220;Read for meaning, first, then edit.&#8221; I&#8217;m a light editor as a result&#8230;maybe it&#8217;s my age, maybe it&#8217;s journalism training, but I like to write it down and get outta there. I&#8217;ve almost never found that having &#8220;extra time&#8221; to edit makes a document much better. Usually that editing effort is dilutive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonaldHTaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>DonaldHTaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>I think it goes further than &#039;Good is good enough&#039;, Frank. I&#039;d say (not terribly originally) that &#039;the perfect is the enemy of the good&#039;. In other words, if you strive to perfect every last detail, you&#039;ll never get the job finished.

More to your point, in my distant past life as a translator, I was once asked to change &#039;start&#039; to &#039;begin&#039;. Did it make any difference? No, but it was a &#039;happy-to-glad&#039; correction that stood between me and a cheque, so I naturally made it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it goes further than &#8216;Good is good enough&#8217;, Frank. I&#8217;d say (not terribly originally) that &#8216;the perfect is the enemy of the good&#8217;. In other words, if you strive to perfect every last detail, you&#8217;ll never get the job finished.</p>
<p>More to your point, in my distant past life as a translator, I was once asked to change &#8216;start&#8217; to &#8216;begin&#8217;. Did it make any difference? No, but it was a &#8216;happy-to-glad&#8217; correction that stood between me and a cheque, so I naturally made it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Roche</title>
		<link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Roche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Hi  Laura, well said. Yep, that&#039;s a good way to characterize them...we reprint if they want. Or make those &quot;happy-to-glad&quot; changes. I&#039;ve learned to let go with word changes, but I do try to alert people that every change is a chance for an error. And generally those &quot;happy-to-glad&quot; changes are requested when the airplane is just about to touch down on the runway. That&#039;s a dangerous time for a course correction. Ah, but in this business it&#039;s the nature of the beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi  Laura, well said. Yep, that&#8217;s a good way to characterize them&#8230;we reprint if they want. Or make those &#8220;happy-to-glad&#8221; changes. I&#8217;ve learned to let go with word changes, but I do try to alert people that every change is a chance for an error. And generally those &#8220;happy-to-glad&#8221; changes are requested when the airplane is just about to touch down on the runway. That&#8217;s a dangerous time for a course correction. Ah, but in this business it&#8217;s the nature of the beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2007/06/03/the-best-communicators-know-both-the-pareto-rule-and-the-dilbert-rule/#comment-744</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite editor bosses used to call those &quot;happy-to-glad changes.&quot; You want to say &quot;we&#039;re glad to announce&quot; instead of &quot;we&#039;re happy to announce&quot;? Fine, no argument. Client feels like they&#039;ve added value, writer is satisfied the point is made effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite editor bosses used to call those &#8220;happy-to-glad changes.&#8221; You want to say &#8220;we&#8217;re glad to announce&#8221; instead of &#8220;we&#8217;re happy to announce&#8221;? Fine, no argument. Client feels like they&#8217;ve added value, writer is satisfied the point is made effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
